The Dark Knight Review- Heath's great, but not Oscar material
The Dark Knight is the best comic book movie ever made.
Set almost a year following the events of Batman Begins, we find Bruce Wayne (Christian Bale) struggling between the mantle of Batman and his desire for a 'normal life', with Rachel Dawes (Maggie Gyllenhaal). And he's nearly there, but then a new homicidal maniac pops up by the name of the Joker (Heath Ledger). But that's not all to this very complex plot- there's the addition of Harvey Dent, Gotham's new District Attorney.
The new Gotham D.A., good cop Jim Gordon and the justice seeking Batman create for quite an interesting character relationship. What one does affects the other and in most instances, each choice each person makes fundamentally affects another.
The story is extremely well written- the Nolan brothers have done a great job of turning David S. Goyer's original story into a screenplay. Every character is played with, every relationship is messed with and every character's life is changed forever.
Chris Nolan has done an amazing job in directing the Dark Knight. Each scene is shot beautifully and each actor fits just fine with their character.
The IMAX scenes are breathtaking and tense. It's incredible that no movies have been shot like this before. The cinematography is also spot-on and Gotham is visually stunning.
You can have a huge budget, an all-star cast and a great story, but it's nothing without a dead right, resolute director. Mr. Nolan has not only created the best movie so far this year, he's created one of the greatest films of the past decade. An Oscar nod is an understatement of what he deserves with his work on The Dark Knight.
There is not one bad performance in this film, every actor plays their roles well. Bale is inspiring as a confused Batman, Eckhart portrays Harvey Dent's rise and fall very well and Gary Oldham puts in one of his finest performances yet as James Gordon. Maggie Gyllenhaal is a better Rachel Dawes than Katie Holmes ever was and Morgan Freeman and Michael Caine, both turn in their usual standards of excellence.
And then there's Heath Ledger.
Whilst Ledger's Joker is fantastically evil and unique, it is not the awe-inspiring, oscar winning performance than a lot of people seem to be making it out to be. Some of his more extreme scenes felt slightly forced, as if Heath was trying too hard.
He will no doubt at least be considered for an Oscar nomination, it may not be for the performance, but maybe for the tragic circumstances surrounding it.
So was he better than Jack Nicholson's Joker?
You can't actually compare them. They're two different characters, in two very different fictional worlds that are based on the same iconic villain. The only commonality both characters share is the name Joker, but other than that it's like comparing waking up to breathing air.
The Dark Knight (12A) is out in cinemas and IMAX nationwide.
Older/Newer
« Terminator Salvation: The Future Begins..... | Harry Potter and the Half Blood Prince trailer »
0 TrackBacks
Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: The Dark Knight Review- Heath's great, but not Oscar material. TrackBack URL for this entry: http://mooneyverse.lanarkshireblogs.co.uk/cgi-bin/mt421/mt-tb.cgi/15512



Not the awe-inspiring, oscar winning performance? Trying too hard?
You know nothing...
Why so serious???
What! No Oscar for Heath, man you must be trippin' fool!
That was better than Citizen Kane Mo'fo!
Listen here you.....
I respect your opinion! But are you blind? Tha was the greatest performance by any actor.
EVER.
jack nicholson was best.